• Skip to primary navigation
  • Skip to main content
independent left logo

Independent Left

Environmentalism, socialism, freedom and equality. #liveablecity

  • About
  • Featured Articles
    • How Farming Must Change to Save the Planet
    • The Housing Crisis: Causes and Solutions
    • Socialism in Ireland
  • Contact Us
  • Podcast
  • Animal Rights
  • Archive
    • Irish Socialist History
    • Dublin City Council Housing
    • Ukraine
    • Protests Ireland
    • Reviews
    • Irish Political Parties
    • All Posts
    • Independent Left Policies
  • Why join?

Artane Whitehall 2024

10/05/2024 by admin 1 Comment

Artane Whitehall 2024: Tally Vote No.1 Councillor John Lyons Artane, Beaumont, Belcamp, Clonshaugh, Coolock, Darndale, Kilmore West, Santry, and Whitehall

Artane Whitehall 2024 Local Election Results, Tallies, Counts

The Artane Whitehall 2024 constituency for the local government election to Dublin City Council consists of Artane, Beaumont, Belcamp, Clonshaugh, Coolock, Darndale, Kilmore West, Santry, and Whitehall. The local government elections in Ireland took place on 7 June 2024.

There were six seats available in Artane – Whitehall. Fine Gael ran two candidates; Fianna Fáil two; the Greens one; Labour one; the Social Democrats two; Sinn Féin four and of course Councillor John Lyons ran for Independent Left.

Councillor John Lyons retained his seat, after topping the poll on the first count.

Here are the results of the count.

The Official First Count for Artane – Whitehall Local Government Council Election 2024

Official first count Whitehall Artane 2024

A fantastic result for Councillor John Lyons who topped the poll in Artane Whitehall.

Councillor John Lyons topped the poll and retained his seat. This was very welcome news of course but the growth of support for the far right in the constituency means there is a lot of work to be done for the community to show that unity not division is the way forward.

Councillor John Lyon’s leaflet for the local government election 2024 said:

An Honour to Serve Artane Whitehall in Local Government

It has been an honour to serve as your Dublin City councillor since I was first elected in 2014 and am asking for your No. 1 vote on Friday 7 June as I run for re-election.

Councillor John Lyons

As a councillor, I’ve helped our community challenge the unfair way that Dublin City Council operates. Decisions are made which put plenty of money into the bank accounts of developers, but when it comes to funding local services and amenities, it’s always an uphill struggle. Recent analysis of DCC’s capital expenditure clearly shows that this area of the city has received the least amount of investment of all areas. This is completely unacceptable.

The focus of my advocacy for the people of Artane, Beaumont, Belcamp, Clonshaugh, Coolock, Darndale, Kilmore West, Santry, and Whitehall is in the following areas.

Housing & Planning

I want high quality, energy-efficient social and affordable housing to be delivered in such numbers that we finally end the housing and homelessness crises. The main reason that Ireland has a massive housing crisis is that from 1990 successive governments stopped investing in state-built homes. The government parties are highly networked among developers and landlords (many FF and FG TDs and councillors are landlords), the very people who benefit from the housing and homelessness crisis.

Artane Whitehall 2024 Councillor John Lyons Housing

We need:

  • A  full programme of directly built, public and affordable housing delivered by local and national government.
  • To stop evictions into homelessness.
  • To introduce rent controls and reductions: ensure that nobody is paying more than 30%  of their income on rent.
  • Stop selling off public land that could be used to address the housing crisis

We need a more democratic, community-centred planning system which treats planning applications in a holistic manner. The new residential developments we so badly require to address the housing crisis must be delivered along with the community, educational and health facilities required for new and existing communities to integrate properly together.

Community Investment

We deserve more sports facilities, community centres, well-maintained areas and playgrounds. Such facilities help foster a sense of community and add life and vibrancy to our areas. Without them, anti-social behaviour grows. The volunteer work that people do in the community is inspiring and it should be backed by investment from DCC.

My successful motion to DCC for a publicly-owned all-weather football facility in Artane-Whitehall is finally being delivered on, with the site currently being selected. But we need a lot more, just to catch up with the levels of investment other areas have obtained from DCC, such as a new Community Centre for Coolock where many groups like the Priorswood & District Men’s Shed can meet.

Disability Rights

We all know people with extra needs and it’s shocking how hard it is to get the support that people with disabilities are entitled to and deserve. I want people with disabilities to be able to live independently and with the same access to jobs, education, and amenities as everyone else. They rarely say it openly, but from the point of view of the government, people with disabilities are an unaffordable burden and their funding priorities reflect this. Even when we do have rights in theory, such as to reasonable accommodation in the workplace, it’s a non-stop and exhausting battle to obtain them. I support the goals of Disability Power Ireland, the Independent Living Movement Ireland, Neuropride Ireland and all those campaigning for disability rights.

Disability Rights ILMI John Lyons

Active Travel

I want to help create a Dublin that is easy, safe and pleasant to travel around. I will continue to support Dublin City Council’s Active Travel Network which aims to enhance the quality of life of Dubliners by connecting all people through the delivery of an integrated 310 km walk-wheel-cycle network. 

Climate Change and Animal Rights

Instead of transitioning towards a harmonious relationship between humans and the environment, the planet continues to heat and wildlife continues to be driven to extinction. We could—and should—implement more green policies locally, but real fundamental change is needed across the world, including a reappraisal of our relationship to animals. I want to see an end to the mistreatment of animals and now believe that Ireland’s food system needs to transition to one that is ethical, sustainable and plant-based.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 17

Opposition to War

For decades it seemed as though the horrors of events like the Second World War were behind us. But the word’s imperial powers are once more resorting to state violence in a race to control the world’s resources. The unbearable suffering of Palestine has its origins in the creation of Israel as a watchdog for US interests in the Middle East. Putin’s invasion of Ukraine is another act of imperialism and I was a founding member of Irish Left with Ukraine in order to offer aid and solidarity to the people of Ukraine.

We live in a world which in the last year in particular has become a darker place, with the growing impact of climate change, war in Ukraine, and the genocide in Gaza. This affects us all but especially the young, whose levels of depression and anxiety are soaring.

Artane Whitehall Councillor John Lyons Justice for Gaza
Independent Left helped found Irish Left with Ukraine Councillor John Lyons

As a councillor I strive not only to give voice to our local community, but also to use my role as much as I can to make the world a better place.

Councillor John Lyons

Artane Whitehall 2024 Election: Unity Over Division

Unity Over Division

In recent months there have been attempts to divide our communities with the dehumanisation of people seeking safety in Ireland. It suits the government to focus on this issue and not their own record on housing, healthcare, and education. Then there is the Far-Right, who want people to punch down, to target anger and hate at the people seeking international protection. I’ve never seen any of them offer the slightest support to the community when we are standing together in campaigns on housing and community investment.

I believe every human being has the right to try to make a better life for themselves, as we did and as our young people still are doing when they are forced to emigrate for lack of affordable homes. Our communities are warm and welcoming places filled with great people and wonderful neighbours. We are better and stronger when we are united.

John Lyons Darndale Together Unity not Division

MY PLEDGE

Never to vote for the sale of public land for private profit

To vote against and fight any further reduction in council responsibilities 

To fight against racism and discrimination in all its forms and welcome people seeking refuge in Dublin 

Never do any deals with Fine Gael or Fianna Fail

Never participate in any council junkets

Vote Number 1 Councillor John Lyons for Artane Whitehall 2024 Dublin Local Government Election

Running for Dublin City council for the people of Artane, Beaumont, Belcamp, Clonshaugh, Coolock, Darndale, Kilmore West, Santry and Whitehall.

To support John, contact him directly johnj.lyons@dublincity.ie; instagram; Facebook; X; or phone 087-7729292.

You can help fund John’s election campaign.

To join Independent Left’s mailing list, scroll down to the bottom of the page here.

The Artane Whitehall local elections interview with John Lyons on Northside Today:

Filed Under: All Posts, Dublin City Council Housing, Elections, Independent Left Policies

A Vegan Transition in Ireland

16/03/2024 by admin 1 Comment

Vegan Tranisition

In March, 2024 James O’Donovan of the Vegan Society of Ireland gave a talk to Independent Left on the need for a vegan transition of agriculture in Ireland. With his permission we share the transcript of this compelling presentation.

Thanks a million to Independent Left for the invite. My name is James O’Donovan, I’m from Cork, originally. I’ve been kind of vegan for about 13 years now, a devout veggie 20 years before that. I’m interested in justice issues, other species, and certainly humans thriving. I have some slides that I’ll work through.

Myself and Bronwyn Slater, who runs the Irish Vegan website, set up Vegan Sustainability Magazine in 2015 or so, and we’ve been running that, but recently we’ve got involved now with the Vegan Society of Ireland, which is a registered charity. I plan to kind of focus on that a bit more moving forward. Of course, we know we don’t live in a vegan world.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 1

Meat consumption has increased radically since 1960s with the industrialization of food systems. That created a kind of a unique problem of having huge surpluses of food. And one of the main ways then to make use of those surpluses was to use those surpluses to feed animals. And then also there was subsidies. So the price of meat and dairy products became less. And then with all the marketing and so forth, you had a increased consumption.

In some countries in Europe now it is starting to decline. That’s meat consumption there per capita.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 2

And this is dairy consumption for different countries. Like you can see, of course, we know China gets lots of the milk powder, baby milk powder, but still their dairy consumption is extremely low, but they’re huge… You can see on the previous one, they went from almost no meat consumption in 1960s up to 60 kilos per person. And when a billion people do that, it has a big effect.

European consumption, meat consumption, it’s a problem everywhere. But still today, 82% of all food calories come from plant-based food sources. So there’s different issues with the food system. You often hear people say the food system is broken. But at the same time, food is being provided to a lot of people, more people than ever before. Food price volatility, like in Ireland, there was very significant food inflation over the last two, three years. At the same time, the supermarkets made huge profits in that time. So a lot of that food price inflation, a lot of it, is artificial. Certainly some of it was driven by energy prices, skyrocketing, fertilizer and so on. But a lot of it is also driven by speculation. There’s intense worker exploitation and even human trafficking in the meat processing and fishing industries in Ireland. And then there’s other global issues. This is just touching some of the issues.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 3
Vegan Transition in Ireland 5

And quite a few of these you’ve mentioned in your article How Farming Must Change. So obviously, the farmers, they’re getting quite a small proportion of the food system total. So you have got all these other industries: chemical industries, veterinary medicines, cages, equipment, everything, all involved in the food system. Agricultural policy and subsidies play a substantial role. And just in terms of why a plant-based food system: environmental impacts is a key one, but I think probably human health impacts and other things I haven’t listed here. So climate change, increasing demand in countries like Ireland, agriculture is just about 2% of GDP. So sometimes we think it’s a huge sector, but when you take all the services into account, it’s not a huge part of the sector in Europe anyway.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 4

The earth is a living system, an integrated system. This model just looks at different planetary boundaries. For example land use change, fresh water change. This down the bottom there is nutrients, phosphorus, and nitrogen. That comes from fertilizer and animal manure. And then this is biodiversity, this is climate change. And this is a recently one, novel entity. That’s all the kind of new chemicals that have been put into the environment, whether it’s pesticides, medicines, pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, et cetera, all those different substances. They’re also having an impact. Out of these nine planetary boundaries, the food system is the key driver in four of them, and also major in two or three of the other ones as well.

There’s a safe operating space, but at the same time… there is a version of this graphic that superimposes doughnut economics on it because obviously there’s lots of people who don’t have enough resources to meet their social needs, so to address poverty, et cetera and so on. Additional resources are needed by some people and less by others. You could talk about that for a while. Biodiversity loss, really agriculture and fishing are the leading cause. They cause about 60 to 80% of biodiversity loss for let’s say fish, vertebrates, birds, amphibians, and agriculture also has a huge impact on invertebrates; all the insects. It’s huge. It’s by far the biggest driver for biodiversity loss. And it’s just because it does that, it just changes natural ecosystems to a pattern like this.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 7

Now, this is in Ireland, just from Google Maps in Ireland, where it’s grass predominantly on the vast majority of the agricultural land in Ireland, probably about 90% of the agricultural land is for grazing. The biodiversity basically has gone there. 90 to 95% of the biodiversity would be gone. Of course there is some biodiversity in the hedgerows and so forth, but it’s completely altered to a natural ecosystem. Industrial fishing is taking place on more than half the ocean. Now, when we’re talking about a plant-based food system, I always try to make clear that I’m just talking about the European context. Unfortunately, one of the things that’s happening in places like West Africa is you’ve got long-distance industrial fishing fleets from China all the way over off West Africa. They have governmental agreements with Senegal and other countries to fish there.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 8

Then they built fish processing, fish meal and fish oil plants along the coast there. And then they vacuum up the fish there, convert them to fish meal and fish oil, send the fish meal and fish oil up to Norway and Scotland and Ireland for feeding our salmon, our carnivorous-farmed fish. And then the local artisanal fishers, their catches are collapsing in those countries and they don’t really have other options. There are multiple examples like that impacting different peoples all over the world. Whether it’s land use changes in South America for Asian feed and European feed for farmed animals.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 9

So we produce more than enough food. Sometimes people have this important question: do we have enough food? Do we produce enough food? We feed over a million tons. It’s hard to get a sense of a million tons. Ireland’s total grain and bean imports for farmed animals comes to about 5 million tons. We import about three and a half and produce one and a half. But globally, we feed over a thousand million tons to chickens and pigs and dairy cows and cattle and fish. This shows how much crops are produced in terms of calories per person, per day. We produce nearly 6,000 calories per person, per day, of food. And let’s see, the World Health Organization says average per person need daily is about 2,300 calories. So we produce a lot of food.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 10

We have different losses; harvest losses, post-harvest losses, non-food use, et cetera, distribution losses. We have food waste amounting to 1,329 kilo calories for every person in the world per day. That’s a lot of food waste. And then here you see these are edible crops fed to farmed animals. So about 1,700 kilo calories per every person on the planet per day is converted to 594 calories. But also, this 3,912 is combined with 1,700 to give this 594. All of that grass pasture, alfalfa, stover (which is the stalks after the grain is harvested), all of that covers huge areas of land and has eliminated biodiversity. And all of that then produces this meat, dairy and fish: 594 calories per person per day. Does that make sense?

Vegan Transition in Ireland 11

We produce loads of food. All of this grass and pasture takes a huge amount of land. If we just ate the food calories ourselves, we could return a lot of that land to ecosystems. In Ireland, on a hectare of land, we can produce 11 tons per hectare of winter wheat or nine to nine-and-a-half, tons per hectare of winter oats or nine to ten tons per hectare of barley. On a hectare of land in Ireland, you produce about 400 kilograms of beef. So there’s a huge productivity difference between plant-based crops and meat-based crops. And that’s why it varies from species to species.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 12

This slide shows the amount of feed for edible weight gain for chicken, pork, and beef. For every 25 kilograms of food that a cow eats, you get one kilogram of meat from the cow. Or for every 10 kilograms a pig eats, you get one kilogram. So that’s why so much land is needed for meat production. Just that feed conversion ratio, that’s what drives the land use.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 13

Now in Ireland, there’ve been quite a few articles on the mistreatment of workers because lots of workers in Irish meat processing plants or slaughterhouses or whatever, they’re not permanent workers, they’re considered to be self-employed. And there has been a lot of exploitation of workers and that’s been documented in the media, particularly in the UK Guardian. But there’s also some research out of Maynooth University on that issue, both in the processing plants as well as in the fishing industry.

Without meat and dairy consumption, global farmland use could be reduced by three quarters. And in Ireland, there is an opportunity. Ireland’s land is the way it is because of our being colonized and our history. Ireland’s current land use pattern is the same now, nearly the same, as it was in 1850, except forestry has gone from about 1% to 11%. The ecosystems in Ireland are some of the poorest quality of any country in the world, actually.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 14

In the ocean, one of the solutions to establish marine protected areas. Now in Ireland, the Fair Seas campaign are calling for 30% to be established. But unfortunately, they’re only calling for 10% to be no-take zones. So Enric Sala, he’s with National Geographic, and his recommendation is that when you have a marine-protected area, it should be a no-take zone. Obviously, all of that has to be negotiated, but the Irish government have been very slow really in implementing those marine-protected areas.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 15

A vegan food system reduces agricultural land use, potentially hugely. Meat, dairy and eggs produce 25% of Europe’s total greenhouse gas emissions. All of that industrial fishing provides very few calories per person, per day. But there are communities who depend on fishing, so we’re not speaking about their situation. A vegan food system could feed additional people because we would stop just the extreme waste of feeding farmed animals. And right now, Ireland and the EU are net food calorie consumers. All the farms in Ireland and Europe, because we’re importing so much feed from outside of the European Union, the quantity of calories that we import is more than the total food calories we produce.

Mostly, we export meat products as well as other food products. They have a much higher value than the grain and legume imports. And so economically, it makes sense. But from a food security perspective, it doesn’t make sense. And a vegan food system has significant potential both to reduce our current emissions as well as if ecosystems could be restored, potentially, they could sequester significant amounts of greenhouse gases. That was a little bit just on why it is obvious to stop causing harm to other sentient living beings. That’s the main reason to go vegan. But then you need a whole lot of other arguments because that doesn’t work for everybody.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 17
Vegan Transition in Ireland 18

Future Prospects for a Vegan Transition in Ireland

Because there are so many companies making so much money out of the food system, nobody wants things to change. Everybody contests the food system, with different arguments being put forward. Misinformation, lobbying, they’re all very substantial. The slide here is just a model for looking at why it’s difficult to change food systems. People talk about lock-ins, with different lock-ins in a particular system. In Ireland, for example, we’ll take a look now at the income of Irish farmers.

Certainly, there are some Irish farmers caught in poverty; they have very low incomes. Some of them of course have incomes from other work, but some farmers don’t. There’s a concentration of power. That includes things like politics, lobbying, the banks, RTE in terms of media. Now there have been some good programs like Planda go Pláta recently on TG4 as well as other programs. But programs like Ear to the Ground, programs like RTÉ Radio 1 on Saturday mornings at eight o’clock, they all normalize the current system, make it seem efficient, make it seem biodiversity-friendly even.

And then you’ve got institutional lock-ins. So you’ve got organizations like the Department of Agriculture, Bord Bia. You’ve got Teagasc and agricultural research lock-in. As well you’ve got the universities. So all of those institutions, they’re supporting, they’re training future food scientists and farmers and so on, to support this food system. So when you’re trying to shift a food system, you have to look at trying to address some of those imbalances, reshape them or redirect them. Now, in Europe, the food system, agriculture is just one part of the food system. So then you’ve got processing, and then you’ve got retailing, and then you’ve got food service; restaurants and so on. So you’ve got about 9.1 million farms in Europe. You’ve got 300,000 food processing facilities. 1.1 million retail, etc. 1.5 million restaurants. There’s the employment, and there’s the value added.

Now, if we change protein production in Europe to plant-based proteins, we’re not looking to change the whole food system. We’re just looking to move from extremely inefficient and wasteful and polluting meat production to plant-based proteins. We’re still going to need food processors. Obviously, we won’t need, thankfully, slaughterhouses anymore. But we’re still going to have retailing, we’re still going to have food service activities. Now, of course there’s a critique of let’s say the supermarket system or whatever. There’s all these different elements in it, but mostly when we’re focusing on food system change, we’re focusing on transitioning away from hurting and harming animals. That’s where most intense suffering is happening, they’re suffering the most, you could say, in this system.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 19

And so lots of the other facilities, they’re not going to change unless there’s other social changes in society. This slide shows, in one particular quarter, this just shows the GDP output of these different sectors in the Irish economy. You can see that industry excluding construction, in one quarter it’s about 50 billion. You see all the different sectors, and agriculture and fishing is just down here in that particular quarter, maybe quarter four is a slow one because the total GDP in a year is over 10 billion from agriculture. But it’s important to keep in mind that agriculture isn’t a gigantic sector.

The next just few slides are just to look at the National Farm Survey, which is produced by Teagasc for many years. In 2018, I was looking at it, and in 2018 there was 92,000 large farms that had an income over 8,000 euros. And I just noticed today in 2023, that’s dropped now to 85,000 large farms. So that’s roughly on about 4 million hectares. Now we have 47,000 small farms and they all, in general, operate at a loss of about 2000 euros a year according to the last survey. But they get a subsidy of 5,000 euros a year. So they have an income of about 3000 euros a year.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 20
Vegan Transition in Ireland 21

This shows the number of these large farms. So we’re only talking about large farms now. Often you’ll hear this number of, we have 130,000 farms, but nearly 50,000 of them are those tiny farms that make no money, basically. Then we have these other farms. You can see cattle rearing, cattle other, and sheep make up more than 70% of the farms. These three sectors make up more than 70% of the farms. Dairy makes up 15,000 farms, and tillage 6,000. Then when you look at the income of these 70% of the farms, you see it’s below 20,000 euros, and that’s after getting a large subsidy. Now, last year because of the war in Ukraine, there were no vegetable oils available. So the price of dairy fats went very, very high. And so dairy farmers had a 50% increase in incomes. It’s expected to drop close back down to here this year.

The point is, tillage farmers are very keen to drive diversification, to move into different sectors. The average age of beef farmers in Ireland is 62, so there’s lots of social issues there, and also they have low income.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 22

This is the percentage of farms. You can see here that 35% of farms have an income under 10,000 in a year. You can see there are 15% of farms, nearly, which have incomes over a hundred thousand. That’s substantial. I’m just pointing out the fact that there is substantial poverty in some of the farms. And here you can see this blue in cattle rearing, cattle other, and so on, and sheep. It’s in those sectors, and obviously it’s where the land is poorest more to the west and the north of Ireland, that those farms are located where they have income of under 10,000 euros for a whole year. And that’s after getting a subsidy of 15,000.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 23

Vegan Transition in Ireland 24

Vegan Transition in Ireland 25

Each dairy farmer gets a check in the door, a direct payment of 21,000 in 2022, that’s 14% of their family farm income, FFI. That’s the family farm income. Now, for cattle rearing, they got a direct payment of 15,000, but they ran their business at a loss. So they only had an income of under 10,000 euros. Cattle Other had an income of about 18,000. Sheep farmers had an income of about 17,000. And tillage farmers got a check in the door of 30,000 euros, and that was 40% of their family farm income. Speaking just economically, there’s a huge problem with the beef and sheep sector. That’s just the situation in Ireland.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 27

This shows the greenhouse gas emissions from the agricultural sector in Ireland. And you can see kind of from 1990 to now, to 2022, it’s just increased marginally. Often you hear lots of people are campaigning on climate change and so on, but it’s not changing at all. So no matter what you hear about that, it’s not changing.

Solutions: A Vegan Transition in Ireland

The solutions to climate warming are to stop subsidizing fossil fuels, and move subsidies to restore nature and biodiversity. Now, there’s no political will for this in Ireland at the moment. And there doesn’t seem to be will in the farming community either. This just shows some of the difficulties and what’s happening.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 28

Development banks are funding increased meat production around the world. The EU spent 250 million on advertising. China’s investing in meat processing plants in Ireland.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 29

This slide is showing the impact of lobbying groups. They fought against the EU ban calling for the end of caged farm animals.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 30

You have organizations in Ireland working (I think it’s fair to say unsuccessfully), to address things like water pollution and nitrates in Ireland from farms. And then you have some movements, more in the UK and also starting in Ireland, for institutions to go through a democratic process where they decide to serve just plant-based options at their institution. So that’s positive, as more young people are getting involved with that. And then you’ve got the Danish government invests a hundred million into plant-based funds, plant-based foods are growing in Europe. They’re worth 5.8 billion now, and they’re also growing.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 31

So there is some kind of a transition. How big it is? It remains to be seen. Probably lots of people have heard about the political changes in the Netherlands there over the last year. That’s the top half. And then the bottom half is a major conference that’s been happening annually now for farmers to diversify into energy, into agritourism, into horticulture, into lots of different, more financially profitable and areas.

Vegan Transition in Ireland 33

This is the last slide. I think there needs to be investment in agricultural diversification in Ireland, something like a billion a year would have a good effect, a hundred million invested in plant-based startups. Those kind of changes; an end to self-employment contracts in meat plants; an end human trafficking in Irish fisheries; the other points here; all of those would start to shift the system to move it towards a plant-based food system. These are some of the actions that could be taken to help achieve a vegan transition of agriculture in Ireland.

Filed Under: All Posts, Animal Rights, Independent Left Policies

Is Ecosocialism a Fraud?

26/09/2023 by Conor Kostick 7 Comments

Is ecosocialism a fraud?
Creator: Michele Cooper/DPIE | Credit: Michele Cooper/DPIE Copyright: Shared OEH and photographer License.

Is ecosocialism a fraud? It’s a harsh question, but it arises because the term ‘ecosocialist’ has been gathering momentum among the Communist and Trotskyist left for the past two decades and now there’s hardly a party on the left that doesn’t describe itself as ecosocialist. At the same time, none of these parties, to my knowledge, advocate an end to animal farming, only an end to factory farming. To radically alter our disastrous relationship with the environment, we have to phase out the farming of animals – and fish too for that matter. If these parties baulk at such a step, then they fall short of being radical enough to provide a solution to the age of mass extinction that we are living through.

The question of whether ecosocialism is a fraud also arises from the following consideration: if the term ecosocialist carries any substantial meaning then the parties adopting it should have a different practice to when they were not ecosocialists. Do they? It’s surely reasonable to wonder whether we are witnessing fresh thinking by Marxists opening themselves to learning from ecological politics or whether they are simply rebranding to signal that they tick the environmentalist box. For the latter, ecosocialism is all about proving that Marx has the best analysis of the causes of the environmental crisis and that therefore they are the best ‘fighters’ for our future, as they always were… In that reading, nothing has changed except that climate warming is now added to the list of problems that will be solved come the revolution, along with racism, sexism, homophobia, etc.

One prominent author in the ecosocialist milieu whom I believe is a fraud is Kohei Saito, author of several works on the topic, most notably the 2020 book, Capital in the Anthropocene. By offering a critique of that book I hope to point to a wider problem on the left, which is that instead of trying to find a new way forward they are snatching at the environmental movement, pulling it towards failed strategies, whether of a Stalinist or Trotskyist flavour.

The core claim by Saito is that Marx was an ecosocialist. The fact that so many people have missed this is because Engels made a hash of understanding Marx’s late writings. One wonders why nobody since then spotted this. Fortunately, Saito can explain where Engels went wrong and what Marx meant to say. The evidence to prove this is extremely flimsy, and most of the book is simply conjecture and speculation, despite it being presented as firmly grounded. Any sentence that begins, ‘it is unfortunate that Marx did not elaborate on…’ should be a red flag. It is a warning that what is about to follow is not, in fact, in Marx. Ditto sentences like, ‘if Marx were able to finish Capital there are good reasons to assume that he would have elaborated on…’ This is speculation, not interpretation.

According to Saito, the ‘ecosocialist project for the Anthropocene is also supported by recent philological findings, thanks to materials published for the first time in the Marx-Engels-Gesamtausgabe (MEGA). The MEGA publishes in its fourth section Marx’s notebooks on the natural sciences, and the scope of Marx’s ecological interests proves to be much more extensive than previously assumed.’

Reading this, you might expect these notebooks to be full of rich evidence for Marx’s ecosocialism, and plenty of material that didn’t make it into Capital when Engels drew on it. I use the term ‘fraud’ because when it comes to actually quoting Marx, Saito only has one example to back up his claim that what is in the notebooks is significantly different to what we have been familiar with all these years.

Is Eco-socialism a Fraud? Two quotes from Marx.

This is it. The great revelation. The big reveal. On this subtle rephrasing of two similar ideas, Saito invites us to climb an edifice so tall that we can look down at planet Earth and see its past, present and future. His entire course of argument has only this single difference at its foundation. I wouldn’t dare climb such a rickety structure, but for the fact that I am wearing a jetpack provided by Timothy Morton.

According to Saito, the importance of the phrasing in Marx’s notebook is that there are two metabolisms mentioned, not one. On the left, we see that landed property produces a rift in the process of social metabolism; on the right, that landed property produces a rift in the process between social metabolism and natural metabolism. Social metabolism is, according to the brief mention of it in Capital (1.198), the process by which commodities change hands, moving to the person who purchases a commodity for its use-value, at which point the commodity finds its ‘resting place’ and drops out of circulation.

Really, there’s very little profound or significant about how Marx was using the term ‘social metabolism’ here. Unlike ideas such as use-value, exchange-value, and surplus-value, Marx didn’t bother to define the concept further, nor did he employ it other than in the quote above. What about ‘natural metabolism’? This refers simply to the processes in nature that exist outside human activity. For Saito, the failure of Engels to acknowledge the difference between social metabolism and natural metabolism is a fundamental mistake in communicating Marx’s method. Marx’s ecology, says Saito, is all about the dichotomy between the two and especially in properly understanding his theory of ‘metabolic rift’.

Did Marx Have a Theory of ‘Metabolic Rift’?

Everyone on the left – from out-and-out Stalinists to more humanist Marxists and Trotskyist socialists – is singing the same chorus on this point and it is quite deafening. Marx was a profound ecologist, and he remains relevant to ecology thanks to the importance of his theory of metabolic rift. Monthly Review editors John Bellamy Foster and Brett Clark talk about ‘Marx’s famous theory of metabolic rift’. In the UK, SWP external faction RS21 go all in on the concept as central to Marx’s relevance today; ditto the Irish SWN with their view that Marx and Engels’ notion of a metabolic rift shows that they had ‘plenty to say’ on environmental degradation. And Saito is the strongest champion of the existence of this theory:

Marx’s theory of metabolism was the  central pillar of his political economy. In other words, his intensive engagement  with ecology and pre-capitalist/non-Western societies was indispensable in  order to deepen his theory of metabolism. Marx attempted to comprehend  the different ways of organizing metabolism between humans and nature in  non-Western and pre-capitalist rural communes as the source of their vitality.  From the perspective of Marx’s theory of metabolism, it is not sufficient to  deal with his research in non-Western and pre-capitalist societies in terms of  communal property, agriculture and labour. One should note that agriculture  was the main field of Marx’s ecological theory of metabolic rift. In other  words, what is at stake in his research on non-Western societies is not merely  the dissolution of communal property through colonial rule. It has ecological  implications. In fact, with his growing interest in ecology, Marx came to see the plunder of the natural environment as a manifestation of the central  contradiction of capitalism. He consciously reflected on the irrationality of  the development of the productive forces of capital, which strengthens the  robbery praxis and deepens the metabolic rift on a global scale.

Kohei Saito, Marx in the Anthropocene  (Cambridge University Press, 2023), p.200.

I’ve highlighted in bold how Saito repeatedly asserts that Marx had a worked out ecological theory of metabolic rift, which in turn was derived from a theory of metabolism that was the central pillar of his political economy. This is somewhat like a hypnotist planting ideas against an inchoate background drone. You would be forgiven for reading text like this and taking away one idea: Marx had an ecological theory.

Marx, however, never used the term ‘metabolic rift’, not once.

Just think about this fact for a moment. If you want to say that Marx had an original theory of the falling rate of profit, you can easily provide plenty of evidence. If you want to say that Marx had an original theory about the forces and relations of production, or that Marx had an original theory about the contribution of labour to the value of a commodity, you can provide plenty of evidence for that too. But for Marx’s ‘famous’ contribution to ecological thinking, the theory of the metabolic rift we have… just one sentence in his massive corpus of writing that includes both the word ‘rift’ and the word ‘metabolism’.

It is dishonest to claim anything more than that Marx, when taking notes on a book about how farming degrades the soil, attributed this degradation ultimately to large-scale landed property. That’s what his sentence means and Engels wasn’t far wrong when phrasing it the way he did in Capital. For those like Saito who think this was a disastrous amendment that hid a profound ecological theory from readers of Marx for over a hundred and fifty years, then you have to assume that Marx kept Engels in the dark about his theory of metabolic rift. The two friends chewed over a vast range of topics over many years, from fundamental laws of economics down to the art of snowball fighting, but not ecology. Or if Marx did broach the subject, Engels simply forgot all about it.

If you want a theory of metabolic rift, help yourself. But do so on the basis of the writings of those who genuinely developed the concept, especially István Mészáros and John Bellamy Foster. A theory of ‘metabolic rift’ does not exist in Marx. I’m not sure you should want to deploy Foster’s theory, by the way, because for him, the ‘rift’ that is ravaging the planet occurred when capitalist production separated use values from exchange values and pursued the latter. The problem with this model is that it doesn’t fit the historical facts. Human societies were destroying forests, depleting natural resources, and converting wilderness into mono-crops and regions for animals to feed on for millennia before capitalist production accelerated these processes. Timothy Morton is much more in tune with the actual course of events when they writes of a ‘severing’ some seven thousand years ago that created a logic that is playing out dramatically today. As a matter of fact, Marx himself is better than the ecosocialists on the pre-capitalist alienation of humans from the natural world.

If Marx had a powerful ecological theory, then how is it that Marxists were far less able to predict the crisis engulfing the planet than non-Marxists? Until now, Marxist parties predicted a crisis of overproduction and underconsumption. Their focus was on the falling rate of profit and the various economic contradictions of capitalism, such as those which produce a boom-bust cycle. Where are the predictions about the catastrophe that we are now living through? They are everywhere in the environmental movement but almost nowhere in Marxist writings until after the fact.

Here’s an example that struck me, written in 1972:

As you abrogate all mind to yourself, you will see the world around you as mindless and therefore not entitled to moral or ethical consideration. The environment will seem to be yours to exploit. Your survival unit will be you and your folks or conspecifics against the environment of other social units, other races and the brutes and vegetables.

If this is your estimate of your relation to nature and you have an advanced technology, your likelihood of survival will be that of a snowball in hell. You will die either of the toxic by-products of your own hate, or, simply, of over-population and overgrazing. The raw materials of the world are finite.

If I am right, the whole of our thinking about what we are and what other people are has got to be restructured. This is not funny, and I do not know how long we have to do it in. If we continue to operate on the premises that were fashionable in the pre-cybernetic era, and which were especially underlined and strengthened during the Industrial Revolution, which seemed to validate the Darwinian unit of survival, we may have twenty or thirty years before the logical reductio ad absurdum of our old positions destroys us. Nobody knows how long we have, under the present system, before some disaster strikes us, more serious than the destruction of any group of nations.

Gregory Bateson, Steps to An Ecology of Mind.

Isn’t it powerful? Deep too, in that, based on a philosophy of what a mind is, Bateson predicted the world we have arrived at. This is not, however, in the slightest way influenced by Marx. In fact, it might even be anti-Marxist in that for many Marxists the human mind is so qualitatively different to the rest of nature – which, they say, is not dialectical in any important sense – that moral and ethical considerations apply only to human behaviour.

There’s nothing in Monthly Review before the late 1990s that remotely comes close to this prophetic writing by Bateson.

What was Marx’s Ecological Thinking?

Having devoted an entire book to Marx’s concept of metabolic rift and how it is an ‘indispensable conceptual tool for the ecological critique of contemporary capitalism’ (in other words, a whole book about a theory that cannot be found in Marx), Saito fails to mention some more famous passages in Marx that shed light on his actual ecological thinking.

In Capital I.8, Marx wrote: ‘The coal burnt under the boiler vanishes without leaving a trace, so, too, the tallow with which the axles of wheels are greased.’ Far from applying a theory of metabolic rift to appreciate that burning coal is going to have serious implications for life on Earth, Marx hadn’t the faintest concept of runaway carbon emissions leading to global warming. For him, there was no environmental consequence to burning coal. Only if you are dedicated to the project of repackaging Marx to sell to the ecological generation will you squirm at the passage. Everyone else will shrug. Why should Marx have been a powerful ecological thinker? Most of the processes that have led to the crisis we are facing only really took off after his death.

For example, the crisis of agricultural soil, which so many ecosocialists raise to prove Marx’s credentials has emerged in a very different form to anything envisaged by Marx. Marx firmly believed that large-scale capitalist production on the land would lead to a depletion of the fertility of the soil. That didn’t happen because of the discovery of techniques to refertilise the soil with chemical processes. Today, food production is ten times greater than when Marx made his notes on the soil. Below, for example, is the trend of the corn crop in the US.

corn trend is eco-socialism a fraud

There is a soil-related catastrophe unfolding, but it was not one that Marx could reasonably have anticipated. The production of nitrogen for use on the land has contributed to global warming and the runoff from chemical fertilizers has devastated life in rivers as well as created enormous and growing dead zones in the seas of planet Earth.

What are we to make of the statement in Marx (Capital 1.7) that: ‘A spider conducts operations that resemble those of a weaver, and a bee puts to shame many an architect in the construction of her cells. But what distinguishes the worst architect from the best of bees is this, that the architect raises his structure in imagination before he erects it in reality.’

Isn’t it clear that Marx had a model that considered humans fundamentally different to animals and insects? This is no longer a sustainable model. There is plenty – and growing – evidence that bees are sentient: they engage in play; they suffer stress; they warn each other of hazards. Spiders, too, are not Cartesian automata: they have dreams as they sleep. The definition of mind here in Marx is very anthropocentric: it requires the mind to create a structure in the imagination before acting. As it happens, we share an evolutionary path all the way back to before the branch leading to birds that allows for this kind of mind to evolve and we are not alone in being able to raise a concept in our imagination before acting on it. Ravens, for example, have been proven to engage in exactly this kind of imaginative planning.  But there are other types of mind on planet Earth. The octopus is a fascinating creature with undeniable sentience but its mind has evolved on a different path and it does its thinking by manipulating objects with its extraordinary limbs.

Is Ecosocialism a Guide to Action?

On 6 June 2023, Russia blew up the Kakhovka Dam causing a massive flood of water to wash away large nature reserves and national parks. The Trotskyist-controlled ecosocialist websites like that of the Global Ecosocialist Network have had literally nothing to say about this. Monthly Review, on the other hand, backed Scott Ritter’s arguments that this act of ‘ecological terrorism’ was the work of Ukraine.

The people most behind the ecosocialist brand are apologists for Russia and, indeed, you will search in vain for criticism of China’s harmful environmental policies in Monthly Review. Instead, the founder of the ‘metabolic rift’ theory is hugely positive about Xi Jinping of China and his environmentalist credentials.

What kind of ecological theory has a practice that is aligned to a geopolitical approach to world politics? One that praises China, tries to explain away Russian imperialism, and focuses entirely on the west? Clearly it is one that is deeply flawed. Either we save the planet through a global transformation or we all go into the void together. Picking a side among the powerful nation states of the world is to remain hopelessly enmeshed in a lethally narrow, limited and fatally incomplete kind of ecological politics.

The Stalinist thinkers who developed the ecosocialist brand have dragged the Trotskyists in their wake. ‘Ecosocialism’ in this guise is an utterly contaminated political program. The attempt to rebrand Marx as a powerful ecological thinker is a fraudulent exercise and points to a fraudulent practice, where optics are more important than recognising the true depths of the transition that we have to manage. We don’t just have to undo the harm created by capitalism, we have to rethink our relationship to nature in a way that is not permeated by seven thousand years of treating everything non-human as exploitable. That’s not going to be easy, but being dishonest about Marx’s limitations means even advocates of revolution remain trapped in a way of thinking that will prevent our escape from the harm we are doing to the planet.

For an interview about this topic with Andy Wilson of Traveller in the Evening, see here.

Filed Under: Animal Rights, Independent Left Policies

Support Disability Power March

18/07/2023 by admin 1 Comment

Disabled People Can't Wait. Disability Power march.

Independent Left stands in full solidarity with DPI and disabled activists as we march to mark Disability Pride month’s campaign for basic rights, destigmatisation of disability and to celebrate being disabled and the positivity of the community. Disabled people are so often ignored pushed aside and their issues and campaigns are often argured for by non disabled people; this why it is crucial to support groups like DPI and disabled people who are leading the charge for change. We encourage all who can to attend the DPI march on the 22nd of July at 2pm gathering at Trinty College Dubin, before heading on to Dáil Éireann. Please share DPI’s messages across social media and to come together to protest for change and also celebrate the positivity and joy of the disabled community.

By Ciara Neville.

Filed Under: Independent Left Policies, Protests Ireland

End Animal Farming: RTE’s Dairy’s Dirty Secret

11/07/2023 by admin 1 Comment

Cow Diary Industry Bars End Animal Farming

Independent Left are proud to fully endorse the statement of the National Animal Rights Association after the showing on 10 July 2023 of Fran McNulty’s exposure of the terrible practices in Ireland’s dairy industry. It provides yet another case study of why we should end animal farming.

The statement in full:

After watching tonight’s RTE Investigates documentary, ‘Milking It: Dairy’s Dirty Secret’, we at NARA would like to say how horrified, sickened, and yet not surprised we are by what we saw.

The use and abuse of the female cows, and the use, abuse and violence to the calves are just a small insight as to the suffering all animals endure at the hands of humans involved in animal agriculture.

RTE’s documentary highlights a lot, but missed a great opportunity to discuss actual animal rights. Such as discussing veganism and why we shouldn’t be using any animal for any reason in the first place. They also could have ventured into the concept of helping farmers transition into non-animal agriculture.

If you are truly as horrified by what you saw as we are, the only way to stop the continued, horrific physical, mental and emotional violations you witnessed is to adopt a vegan diet immediately. Proposals of improved welfare standards are just desperate attempts by the industry to fool consumers into believing that there is a kind way of using, abusing and killing animals – when we all know there isn’t.

In Ireland there is no excuse for not being vegan. No one can say they are “not aware” of the suffering anymore. We encourage everyone to please do the right thing and go vegan, starting from NOW – and if you need help, let us know!

End Animal Farming. Dairy's Dirty Secret.
RTÉ Investigates: Irish dairy has transformed into multi-billion euro industry. But at what cost? RTÉ’s Fran McNulty investigates the environmental impact and discovers what the dairy boom means to the welfare of more than half a million unwanted bull calves born every year. Shown on Monday 10th July 2023 at 9.35pm on RTE One and RTE Player.
Clip from the investigation.

Independent Left’s case as to why we should end animal farming is made in our feature on how farming must change to save the planet and in our animal rights policy.

Filed Under: Animal Rights, Independent Left Policies

  • Page 1
  • Page 2
  • Page 3
  • Interim pages omitted …
  • Page 6
  • Go to Next Page »

Copyright © 2025 · Aspire Pro on Genesis Framework · WordPress · Log in